Tag Archives: communities of practice

Embodiment – physicality and presence in #activelearning

Imagine active learning. What comes to mind for me is people, together, finding value and common purpose in each other. ‘People’ is a significant word in this description. It’s not an abstract notion of ‘learner’, it is a real, humanistic … Continue reading

Posted in active learning, belonging, Co-operative pedagogy, learner engagement, learning space, Literacies and intelligence, PhD, polycontextuality, studio | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Product – co-production vs commodification as a site of learning

Yesterday, I spent much of my time in meetings: one appraisal, one research-related, one project-related, and one a planning meeting. Coincidently, each of those four meetings required me to remind myself that an education is not, “A thing that can … Continue reading

Posted in active learning, Co-operative pedagogy, employability, learner engagement, studio-based learning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Repositioning contact time to explain the value of education

I happened to mention that I worked in higher education to a women who sold me a vase in a craft shop; the sort of situation where I normally feel at ease with people I meet beyond the educational setting. … Continue reading

Posted in belonging, learner engagement, learning space | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lurking, Active Learning and Legitimate Peripheral Participation #socmedhe18

The first principle of active learning according to Bonwell & Eison (1991) is that it is more than passive listening. A rather negative note to start on perhaps, but we can see where they’re coming from. As we prepare, at … Continue reading

Posted in active learning, belonging, Literacies and intelligence, open learning, research, Smart Learning book, social media for learning | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The future is active – implications for future academic practice

I have been thinking about the future academic and the implications for academic development recently. The Open University’s ‘Innovating Pedagogy’ is an insightful annual report (http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/), though I would love to see one for 2018. I have seen Mike Shales … Continue reading

Posted in Academic innovation, active learning, Assessment & Feedback, belonging, Digital Placemaking, learner engagement, Literacies and intelligence | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment